"If your program is bawling for control points, you've blown the taking of the series and you need to do it over" If your program is bawling for control points, you've blown the taking of the series and you need to do it over.īottom line, I would try ICE and see if you run into any limitations which would justify the purchase of either of the two now very overpriced pano programs. Control point editing is a complete non issue for me. Autopano Giga for even more money and PTGui Pro have masking, which can come in handy once in a great while. An exception would be HDR panos, available with APP and PTGUI Pro where you can have the program spit out two or three layers to combine in PS or Photomatix, or exposure blend in program, so there's that.Īutopano Pro has an easy to use interface and is without any doubt the best stitcher of problematic series, a real garbage mouth. A marquee feature is Autocomplete, which fills in the voids. Microsoft ICE is free and hard on the heels of the two bigs. At this point I feel sorry for any landscape photog not using CC. As an important bonus, the stitch is a massive DNG which will take heavy shadow and highlight correction. A really nice time saver not to have to pass huge tiffs back and forth. I do a boatload of panos and like most pano shooters I'm extremely fussy. It's what I'm using almost exclusively now. Lightroom's pano assembly works really well and has Boundary Warp, which fills in the voids on the ends of the pano without needing to Transform>Warp in Photoshop. The efficiency of auto mode will allow for several alternative sequences shot at different positions and angles with single battery.I have owned and used both Autopano Pro and PTGui Pro for years, but I think that their era of dominance is probably coming to an end, owing to free/included competitors. The best camera position for landscape photography is always a guess, but pano mode will guarantee proper spacing and overlapping. (i) - I'm not sure about other models of DJI pocket-size drones, but for Mavic 2 Pro the Go4 app is allowing to tilt the camera to center on target first and start shooting around for a total of 3x3 images. "For me the biggest drawbacks of auto-pano mode are (i) it always shoots with horizon centred which is usually what you'd never want and (ii) you lack the ability to select the field of view required." It's definitely more tedious approach, but offering way more options to tweak files to your liking before importing them into stitching software. Although AEB approach is a must for JPEG format of rough files, DNG is offering wildly wide range of adjustments during files preparation. "Depends on the dynamic range of the shot."ĭepends on a workflow you decided to employ when dealing with panoramic photography. The M2P is signficantly better than M1 but still at the end of the day has a small,limited range sensor.įor me the biggest drawbacks of auto-pano mode are (i) it always shoots with horizon centred which is usually what you'd never want and (ii) you lack the ability to select the field of view required. The M2 has fairly limited range so some scenes absolutely require AEB combined with it to not burn things out. Depends on the dynamic range of the shot.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |